The Balance Between Expressing Outrage and Ignoring Ignorance
Not content to let the Alabama state legislature and the Mississippi Personhood movement solely vie for the title of Defender of Southern Ignorance, the Tennessee Tea Party gave Massachusetts Representative Barney Frank a lovely send off. Of course, by lovely send off, I mean homophobic rant. At its core, though, this response was likely meant to generate attention for a group of people that desperately crave it.
This has led me to think about how we express outrage when offensive things are expressed in the public forum. It really is a conundrum. Our natural instinct is to assail those that spew vitriol against the things we hold dear. This can include everything from our favorite football team to a beloved politician. The thing we seem to forget in all of this, however, is the sticks and stones rule of the social media driven world we live in. To paraphrase, “sticks and stones may break my bones, but the more mentions on Twitter and Facebook, the worse it gets.”
So, where do we go from here? That is not an easy question to answer. Silence can often be interpreted as acquiescence. Such silence acquiesced to racism and bigotry, and allowed it to dominate this southern culture I hold dear for many, many years. Still, the Twitter and Facebook driven political discourse that currently dominates the national conversation can quickly spiral out of control. We can end up giving more value than we intended to the groups that we are denouncing.
So, what do we do? I’m not sure how to answer that question. I’ve spoken out many times against those that I find to be an affront to all that is lovely and fair. Nonetheless, I understand that I may be contributing to their cause. My only hope is that I also reach people of conscience. My only suggestion is that if you find yourself in a similar situation, you might measure your words for the best effect.







